Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu May 02, 2024 11:19 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

What do you think of this idea?
I love it 12%  12%  [ 4 ]
I like it with some changes 9%  9%  [ 3 ]
I hate it 79%  79%  [ 26 ]
I secretly like the idea, but don't want to tell Lucius...so I will say I hate it. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 33
Author Message
 Post subject: Lucius has a spell idea to substitute for FS
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:37 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:17 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Los Angeles, CA
What if we got rid of the unusable/restricted/hated Final strike spell, and gave Sorcs a lower level knock/wizlock spell that would be pickable and bashable, and one GM "Greater Wizlock" that would make a door unpickable, unbashable, and unpassable with Ether?

This would also help create a mage tower feel for high level Sorcs too.

What are your (non flame) thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:52 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:54 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Pyrgos, Greece
Oh yeah, hoarding places and even more hoarding places.

Great, great...

:roll:

Short answer: I hate it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:54 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:20 am
Posts: 471
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
The idea of a sorceror who is able to charm a victim, lead them to a warded room and then lock them in with no chance of escape or rescue is ropey. I'm not sure any player should have such easy access to the unqualified restraint of another.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:09 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:17 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Dark-Avenger wrote:
Oh yeah, hoarding places and even more hoarding places.

Great, great...

:roll:

Short answer: I hate it.


not with a spell time restriction. Is that the only reason you hate it?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:11 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:17 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Tatali0n wrote:
The idea of a sorceror who is able to charm a victim, lead them to a warded room and then lock them in with no chance of escape or rescue is ropey. I'm not sure any player should have such easy access to the unqualified restraint of another.


Well, holding someone on charm is not a very fun without RP, nor is it an easy thing to do (i.e. OOC resisting, cabals and friends coming to aid). If there is limits to the duration of the door, you could have all of your cabal members waiting outside.

Again, a limited spell duration would change your reason for dislike no?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:48 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:54 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Pyrgos, Greece
OK, it's not only a place for the sorc to hoard lewt, but to even hide himself. If someone is in a locked area and none can go in, he can sit there risk free and even when the timer ends, he recasts the spell.

Look, a sorc that can't be killed.

Only with voodoo this can happen, but anyone can logout when a potential voodoo threat is around. I know it, I've witnessed it with my shaman.

PS: I understand CRS is working almost like that but even then there is a way in to kill the sorc.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:51 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:36 pm
Posts: 1271
Location: Harrisburg, PA
If a sorc wants to be invincible they already have that ability...

Neat idea, although I don't see it happening.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:14 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:53 am
Posts: 1786
Five words.

I really don't like it.

If you want a safe area, go play in one, there are quite a few available.

Besides, no one in their right mind would choose wizlock over imbue.

:P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:23 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 10:33 am
Posts: 570
I wouldn't mind seeing a replacement spell for FS, but not this. Ultimately, this spell only encourages the negative side of sorcs and solo playing. It is interesting but at best doesn't help the game's playability and at worst hurts the game's playability.

Lei Kung


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:02 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:39 pm
Posts: 654
This goes way over the top. There are plenty of places a person can go to hide without other places being made unaccessible. What if a sorceror did it to an inn or a newbie school? There could be a -lot- of problems with something like this. I'm all for the replacement of FS, but not with a spell like this.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group