Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sun May 05, 2024 2:48 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Should chastity be optional for knights, determined by the potential knight's church?
Yes 31%  31%  [ 11 ]
No 57%  57%  [ 20 ]
Eh. Mabey. 11%  11%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 35
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:03 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Oregon, USA
Yes, King Arthur was in reality a Roman soldier who united the Woad tribes under his rule thorugh the marriage of the tribal-princess Gwenevere when the Romans abandoned Briton due to their crumbling empire.

But in the legends, Sir Gawain did vow to chastity, but it was a personal preference, not forced upon him.

But back to the matter at hand. I think that banning people who are prone to mudsex from a certian class is kind of silly. Besides, if people want to mudsex, they will mudsex. Weather they are 'allowed' to or not. But that's none of our business. I just think we should stop connecting marriage with mudsex, because a character CAN marry and NOT do or want any mudsex at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:44 pm 
Offline
Immortal (Inactive)

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 873
Location: Missouri
Tasalamar was not a paladin. He was married. He had several children.
Gerevan was a paladin. He was not married. He had no children. He did once tell Cannibal to take a bath, however, but that isn't terribly relevant to the topic at hand.

IMO: Paladins are interesting precisely because they are so very restricted. They are tightly bound by difficult and sometimes contradictory codes. This conflict makes for interesting stories and characters.

(Well, ostensibly. It also makes for mudsexxers who make paladins precisely because mudsex is taboo only for paladins. Forbidden fruit and all that...)

So, I say, leave it as it is.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:04 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Posts: 886
Location: Hampton, VA
Well played, Wert. I concur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:06 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 4:18 pm
Posts: 2026
Location: In the palm of the left hand black
I like all this presumption that King Authur was a real person. And I like even better the authority in which people are saying who he was and what he did, when no one really knows.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:22 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 2423
Location: Athens, Greece
I don't see anyone mentioning hellions though. What is your idea about them in reference to the subject?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:29 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 7:36 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Seattle
SK Character: Galstan/Cyril/Ulrich/Elar
Hellions aren't sworn to celebacy. Konstantin had a wife and kids. Ulrich had a fiance'.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:30 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 3:09 am
Posts: 2174
Hellions should be raping and pillaging as much as possible. They should marry, but only if the marriage secures them a position of power or wealth. Not that they should stay faithfull...

Teselyn was Nyrimors kid...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:59 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:53 am
Posts: 1786
Only proving the point. Hellions are not knights. They are ninjas! 8)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:13 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2002 3:36 am
Posts: 194
Furthermore, the tale of Arthur and His Knights, while bearing some resemblence to historical fact, was quite possibly perverted by the tale of Cuchulainn and the Red Branch. Take a pagan story, Christianize it. All that rot.


I'll make note that chastity is not always synonymous with celibacy, and oftentimes refers simply to the act of abstinance in preparation for marriage. I'll also note that non-mudsexx0ring characters should get +1 to all stats. KTHXBYE.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:28 pm 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:58 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Spokane, WA
Well, also don't forget that celibacy deals with marrying and chastity has to deal with sex. They are not exclusively linked. If you don't have to be celibate but you have to be chaste, you can marry. You just can never have sex with the person. And vice versa. Not saying that I would expect someone to marry and not have sex but weirder things have happened


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group