| Shattered Kingdoms https://www.shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/ |
|
| Oathbreaker Flag https://www.shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=5686 |
Page 9 of 10 |
| Author: | meztiso [ Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I almost became a spy for the MC. Then I got caught killing the citizens of the nation I was going to spy on. 
And it is the rarity of spies that made it so rewarding to me. The code did not prevent me from any sort of RP and should not stop anyone else ethiere. It just adds a more difficult dimension to it which adds to the thrill. So I would say the code change made that paticular RP more intresting. |
|
| Author: | Khudakh [ Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
meztiso wrote: And it is the rarity of spies that made it so rewarding to me. The code did not prevent me from any sort of RP and should not stop anyone else ethiere. It just adds a more difficult dimension to it which adds to the thrill. So I would say the code change made that paticular RP more intresting.
I think She means thwart the actually RP of spying not the RP of being caught spying. If it was meant so spies couldn't infiltrate said cabal then that's just counter intuitive of what spying really is. |
|
| Author: | Malhavoc [ Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Khudakh wrote: meztiso wrote: And it is the rarity of spies that made it so rewarding to me. The code did not prevent me from any sort of RP and should not stop anyone else ethiere. It just adds a more difficult dimension to it which adds to the thrill. So I would say the code change made that paticular RP more intresting. I think She means thwart the actually RP of spying not the RP of being caught spying. If it was meant so spies couldn't infiltrate said cabal then that's just counter intuitive of what spying really is. It basicly kills a chance for good RP. Cabals are supposed to be secret organizations that are near impossible to get in. If you cannot trust the fellow members then there is no bond. So the idea is to actually watch the potential members and seekers. And see who they deal with, although you cannot intercept tells and the like its still great RP to see how dedicated someone really is. |
|
| Author: | Achernar [ Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nobody would induct someone unless they knew for certain there was no way they were going to screw them over. Dulrik wanted cabals to grow, so he made it possible to be a spy, but not to jump into another faction. There's nothing stopping you from seeking the faction you want to spy in, joining, doing the double crossing, or getting caught. Its just going to take an IMM to say, this is good RP, before you'll get into the second faction. It has happend, a few times, but don't ever count on it. A |
|
| Author: | Benzo Balrog [ Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The oathbreaker flag is part of the administration's consistent effort to make cabals more open and less "elite," which is not to say actually less elite. In my opinion, it is the proper policy. |
|
| Author: | brownboyku [ Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Off topic but this post makes me miss Jinnahra
I was supposed to be the "Patron of the Matron".... |
|
| Author: | Helios [ Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My char went unactive for a period of time, and when I bring him back hes nolonger part of his cabal and is marked as a oath breaker. I have no clue why he was removed and its not all that fair that hes marked. I could understand it better if I was told why hes marked and why he was removed. But is there a way he can have the oath breaker flaged removed? |
|
| Author: | Konge [ Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
He can still join the same cabal and the corresponding tribunal - seems good enough for ordinary situations to me. |
|
| Author: | Tetra [ Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ditto. The character was probably removed because of inactivity. If you were a member in good standing it should be easy to get back in or switch to the appropriate tribunal as Konge said. It is incredibly, incredibly rare though that an oathbreaker flag is ever removed. It isn't something I would hold my breath on. |
|
| Author: | The_Illustrated_Man [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oathbreaker Flag |
How do you get Oathbreaker removed? |
|
| Page 9 of 10 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|