Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 6:34 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2002 7:15 pm
Posts: 1086
Location: Pyrathia
Not my argument Edoras. It is the Imms. I just asked if that WAS the official excuse or not.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:02 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 8:13 am
Posts: 1155
Location: Newton, MA
Besides your blatant and constant use of OOC info I really didn't have any issues with Emet. He was more or less fun to talk with IC - the only things that really pissed me off where the things you refuse to delve into so I wont bother.

Good luck with your next, do try to delete your YIM account or something.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:05 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 4:58 pm
Posts: 946
Location: Tennessee
You have huge potential Algon but like a lot of people have already said you abuse OOC info like no ones business. You have this strange need to know everything that goes on behind the scenes, but you can't seem to seperate the IC/OOC and it really destroys your credibility. Good luck on your next and yes please, delete your YIM.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:13 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:11 am
Posts: 370
Location: Baton Twirling Majorette
OOC, I didn't really have any issues with Emet. He was argumentative, which is good, but tended to turn on quiet mode when he wasn't winning the argument, which isn't so good. At times I got the sense that OOC motivations were more important than they should have been, but I don't have proof of that so I don't think that should be held against him.

I am disappointed that Emet is gone before dealing with some fairly serious (to others) roleplay issues that are left behind in his wake. I thought certain of his behaviours were very unbefitting a priest of Dulrik and a servant of the Council of Blossoms. As many know, there was ongoing roleplay regarding that which cannot be completed now, and will likely just be abandoned and forgotten.

Hard feelings IC remain against the Talons. The damage to the reputation of the Church of Truth remains for other people to sort out, if they can. Emet will be remembered, no doubt, but I think more as a bad example than as one to be admired.

Good luck on your next.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:14 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
Achernar wrote:
Every loophole he found he reported before using it and when the response was that its not a bug, he demonstrated that indeed it was, and changes happened. The players who were banned made no such reports and waited for no IMM response before cheating themselves all the way to GM.


Is it just me or is this just evidence that the immstaff has no clue what is going on and does not value legitimate complaints by players about things that may be bugs? I mean it shouldn't have to result in a player going out of his way to abuse something just to prove it is indeed a bug.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:15 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
ninja_ardith wrote:
Achernar wrote:
Every loophole he found he reported before using it and when the response was that its not a bug, he demonstrated that indeed it was, and changes happened. The players who were banned made no such reports and waited for no IMM response before cheating themselves all the way to GM.


Is it just me or is this just evidence that the immstaff has no clue what is going on and does not value legitimate complaints by players about things that may be bugs? I mean it shouldn't have to result in a player going out of his way to abuse something just to prove it is indeed a bug.


Pretty sure I said that already. Like, third post on the thread.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:17 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
I only like to pay attention to you when you're playing a sprite that puffs on a cigarette.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:18 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
And when I'm pointing out that you're repeating my ideas, evidently.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:22 am 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:58 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Spokane, WA
The problem is that he made the char exclusively for OOC reasons. Any RP he generated was only to keep up the facade so that he can get what he calls bugs changed. He even admitted that after he deleted the char that he made the char only to exploit bugs. Yet, he was allowed in leadership positions, and got to keep the char despite being an OOC tool.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 9:24 pm
Posts: 75
Video killed the Radio star....
yim & hypocritical imm staff killed Sk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group